Pages

Friday, December 27, 2013

Queen Elizabeth II wore one of her favourite fur coats on Christmas Day

Britain's Queen sparks anger over fur for Christmas

Britain's Queen sparks anger over fur for Christmas
AFP Photo
Britain's Queen Elizabeth II (L) receives a bouquet of flowers following a traditional Christmas Day Church Service at Sandringham in eastern England, on December 25, 2013
London:  Britain's Queen Elizabeth II wore one of her favourite fur coats on Christmas Day but her choice of material has angered animal rights groups which termed it as a cruel and uncivilised move.

The fur coat was spotted as she greeted her granddaughter-in-law, Kate Middleton, at her country estate in Sandringham for the royal family's festive celebrations.

"The Queen should not be wearing fur - it's as simple as that. This is 2013 and no right-thinking person would wear fur," Andrew Tyler, director of Animal Aid charity, told the 'Daily Mirror'.

"Fur is now unfashionable amongst right minded people. People know how cruel it is to get fur. It's cruel and uncivilised," he added.

The Queen has been pictured wearing the particular coat on several occasions dating back to 1961 - when she embarked on her royal tour of India.

The charity People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which is known to splash colour on fur coats as a protest against its unethical association with animal cruelty, had launched a campaign this Christmas to give homeless people unwanted fur coats.

"We donate any coats that we don't cover in fake blood for a demonstration to homeless people who can't afford to buy their own coats - after all, the homeless are the only people who have any excuse for wearing fur.

"How can Queen Elizabeth - who had to be taught why people loved Diana, a non-hunting, fur-free vegetarian - not yet have learned what's right and wrong and abandoned fur, the product of immense suffering," a spokesperson said.

"Animals are routinely strangled, electrocuted and skinned alive for their pelts. Fur farming was banned in 2000 because it's a cruel industry that no longer represents British values. We truly hope that the Queen gets with these more enlightened times and chooses to wear something more humane in the future," he added.

The Queen had changed out of the court by the time she attended the traditional Christmas Day church service in the east England country of Norfolk.

On Thursday, marked as a Boxing Day holiday in Britain, her husband Prince Philip will lead a shooting party at Wood

Farm in Wolferton, when male members of the family will down pheasants which will be picked up by the Queen and other female members of the family.

Prince William and Kate are expected to travel to Berkshire so that Prince George can spend time with his other grandparents.
For NDTV Updates,
Story First Published: 

Thursday, December 26, 2013

fat, female and French


The perils of being fat, female and French


Mannequin in shop window in Paris
For decades the image of the slender and chic Parisian woman has been setting the standard as the epitome of style and making some other women in France feel uncomfortably inadequate.
Isabelle, a 50-year-old director of a fashionable Paris art gallery, says: "C'est simple. Chic plus mince egale succes. (It's simple. Chic plus slim equals success)."
She is talking about French women and their figures.
"It's how it works for women here," Isabelle explains. "If you are fat, you will not get that job. But if you have the silhouette - chic, ultra-slim, elegant - you are more or less made."
Isabelle is an all-too-rare exception to the rule - she is actually quite fat - but, being self-employed, she can get away with it, she says. Isabelle likes being overweight in a society that is so obsessed with thinness and conformity.

Fat French euphemisms

  • ronde (round)
  • robuste (robust)
  • forte (strong)
  • solide (solid)
  • dodu (plump)
  • rondelette (chubby)
  • enrobee (coated/enrobed)
"Being fat makes me feel free, even though I can never find anything to wear in the Paris shops. I remember vividly the last time I tried, the look of horror on the shop assistant's face.
"'Madam, we certainly have nothing for you here,' she cried."
It is said that every French woman feels she needs to lose at least 2kg (4.4lbs) and the slimming business in France is huge.
Pharmacies are filled with miracle-claiming diet products and women's magazines run endless columns of slimming advice.
Most of the pressure French women feel to be thin comes from other French women and a society that has zero-tolerance for fat.
"Fat" is a dirty word, an offensive insult. It is difficult to come right out and say it. Thankfully, there is an array of flattering euphemisms to choose from.

Start Quote

We have fallen for a silhouette of supposed perfection that is unattainable ”
Sonia FeertchakEditor, L'Encyclo des Filles
One is not fat, one is ronde, robuste, forte, solide, dodu, rondelette - round, robust, strong, solid, plump, chubby, or even enrobee - enrobed - an adjective otherwise used to describe a mouth-watering coating, usually of thick chocolate, on sweets and cakes but in this case it refers a woman richly-coated in her own body mass.
There is an idea put about in what the French call the "Anglo-Saxon" press that French women do not grow fat.
They simply follow a set of mystic rules, handed down from mother to daughter, that govern their personal grooming, comportment and, most of all, their eating habits.
A sensible, balanced diet. Plenty of fresh produce. Three meals a day. Absolutely no snacking. Regular, reasonable exercise. Nothing to excess.
It is what any educated Western woman would teach her children - male as well as female - whatever their nationality.
Though many women do follow this regime and maintain healthy, reasonably slim figures, to have that wafer-thin silhouette many need to almost starve themselves.
A young woman in Paris
There are plenty of Parisian middle-class families who will sit down to a frugal meal of steamed vegetables and a cup of herbal tea in the evening to avoid weight gain.
"There is simply no mystery about it. Of course French women grow fat," says Sonia Feertchak, editor-in-chief ofL'Encyclo des Filles, a popular guide to health and beauty for teenage girls.
"But the fact is they daren't, and some will even starve themselves because in this society to be a fat female is to be a failure."
"Fat women are seen as stupid. Their lives must be out-of-control, they are judged ugly, weird losers," explains Sonia.
"Women have come so far in France - we have a political voice, good childcare, access to work - but instead of being more confident we are increasingly obsessed with our weight and shape.
"Coco Chanel freed us from the corset more than 80 years ago - but we have fallen for a mental one instead - a silhouette of supposed perfection that is unattainable and leads to eating disorders and misery," she adds.
Everywhere one looks in Paris she is there, that idealised French female, pouting glamorously from buses, billboards and metro stations; petite, fragile and very slim; advertising anything from lingerie and lipstick to discount car-insurance, even food - ice-cream parfait, perhaps, or a rich French cheese poised tantalisingly just beyond the reach of her gorgeous, half-open mouth.
Street advertising in Paris
"It is an absolute tyranny," says Marjorie, a 49-year-old business executive, herself pencil slim.
"The tyranny of the silhouette, we call it - but it is also a kind of dream because it represents total success.
"It is not like in the UK where TV shows have women of all shapes and sizes doing all kinds of things. I love that - chubby 55-year-olds kissing men full on the mouth. You would never see that here," she adds.
Marjorie works near the Paris suburb of Saint Denis where there is a large immigrant population from the Maghreb.
She is inspired by these women with their full, rounded, curvaceous figures and the way they walk tall.
"They are so much more feminine than our Parisian chic," she says, "but the sad truth is that if they want careers in this society they are going to have to get skinny to get ahead."
How to listen to From Our Own Correspondent:
BBC Radio 4: Saturdays at 11:30 and some Thursdays at 11:00
BBC World Service: Short editions Monday-Friday - see World Service programme schedule.
You can follow the Magazine on Twitter and onFacebook

Christmas message: Snowden v Her Majesty the Queen

Edward Snowden's Alternative Christmas message

Edward Snowden warns of a loss of privacy in his Alternative Christmas message broadcast on Channel 4

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet-security/10538055/Edward-Snowdens-Alternative-Christmas-message.html  

 Former US National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed details of electronic surveillance by American and British spy services, warned of the dangers posed by a loss of privacy in a message broadcast to Britain on Christmas Day.

In a two-minute video recorded in Moscow, where Snowden has been granted temporary asylum, he spoke of concerns over surveillance and appeared to draw comparison with the dystopian tale "1984" which described a fictional state which operates widespread surveillance of its citizens.

"Great Britain's George Orwell warned us of the danger of this kind of information. The types of collection in the book - microphones and video cameras, TVs that watch us are nothing compared to what we have available today."
"We have sensors in our pockets that track us everywhere we go. Think about what this means for the privacy of the average person," he said.

"A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all," said Snowden. "They'll never know what it means to have a private moment to themselves, an unrecorded, unanalysed thought. And that's a problem because privacy matters, privacy is what allows us to determine who we are and who we want to be." 

Edward Snowden Christmas message: End mass surveillanc

Watch the video on youtube RT America CNN 

Edward Snowden: ''Asking is cheaper than spying''
Ex-National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden has delivered an "alternative" UK Christmas message, urging an end to mass surveillance.
The broadcast was carried on Channel 4 as an alternative to the Queen's traditional Christmas message.
Mr Snowden focused on privacy, saying: "A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all."
The 30-year-old has temporary asylum in Russia after leaking details of US electronic surveillance programmes.
'Mission accomplished'
Mr Snowden opened his two-minute message, recorded in Russia, with a reference to novelist George Orwell, author of 1984, saying the surveillance technology described in his works was "nothing compared to what we have today".

How intelligence is gathered

How intelligence is gathered
  • Accessing internet company data
  • Tapping fibre optic cables
  • Eavesdropping on phones
  • Targeted spying
He said: "A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all. They'll never know what it means to have a private moment to themselves, an unrecorded, unanalysed thought.
"The conversation occurring today will determine the amount of trust we can place both in the technology that surrounds us and the government that regulates it.
"Together we can find a better balance, end mass surveillance and remind the government that if it really wants to know how we feel, asking is always cheaper than spying."
Channel 4's alternative Christmas message has in the past featured Iran's then-President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad and fictional characters Ali G and Marge Simpson.
Earlier this week, Mr Snowden told the Washington Post: "In terms of personal satisfaction, the mission's already accomplished. I already won."
Mr Snowden was granted temporary asylum in Russia on 1 August.
He fled the US in late May, taking a huge cache of secret documents with him. He faces espionage charges in the US.

President Obama is to make a "definitive statement" in January
"I didn't want to change society. I wanted to give society a chance to determine if it should change itself," he told the Post.
"All I wanted was for the public to be able to have a say in how they are governed."
Last week, a federal judge declared the mass collection of telephone data unconstitutional and a presidential advisory panel suggested reforms.
Both the judge and the panel said there was little evidence that any terrorist plot had been thwarted by the programme.
A few days later, in his end-of-year news conference, US President Barack Obama suggested there might be a review of surveillance by the NSA.
In light of "disclosures that have taken place" and public concerns about the programmes, there might be "another way of skinning the cat", he said.
However, he accused Mr Snowden of causing "unnecessary damage" by leaking documents.
President Obama said he would make a "definitive statement" in January about recommendations by the White House panel.

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Do boxing and chess have anything in common?


Do boxing and chess have anything in common?

Lennox Lewis plays Dominic Lawson at chess
Chess and boxing seem as bizarre a pairing as anything, but they do have something in common, writes David Edmonds.
One is a duel often characterised by cruelty, ruthlessness and violence. And boxing is much the same.
The former world heavyweight champion, Lennox Lewis, is now more likely to be seen hunched over the chess board than in the boxing ring. Yet the very idea that boxers might play chess, and vice versa, strikes many people as incongruous.
Chess after all, is the ultimate cerebral sport - boxing the most nakedly brutal. When his chess opponents discover he used to box, Lennox says, they're convinced they'll whip him. "And when I beat them, they're upset."

Find out more

chess pieces; boxing gloves
David Edmonds is a chess writer and co-author of Bobby Fischer Goes To War.
Dominic Lawson interviews Lennox Lewis over a game of chess as part of the series,Across The Board on BBC Radio 4 at 13:45 GMT on 1 January 2014
He's not the only chess-playing boxer. Lewis successfully defended his title against the Ukrainian Vitali Klitschko. Klitschko holds a PhD and has entered Ukrainian politics. Like his brother, Wladimir, another boxing champion, Klitschko is a keen chess player.
Lewis jokes that he wants a promoter to put on a chess match between him and his old rival - though it seems unlikely that any chess bout would command the multimillion dollar purse they fought over in 2003.
The weirdness of combining boxing and chess - brain and brawn - has been used to attract spectators to a new sport, "chess boxing." It sounds like something from Alice in Wonderland.
In chess boxing the two combatants have alternating rounds of chess and boxing, victory achieved in several ways but most clearly by a checkmate or a knockout.

Chess boxing (chess)Chernobayev of Belarus competes against India"s Shaliesh at chess...
1/2
After trying to bash and bruise each other around the face and body, the opponents remove a single glove and continue the duel, sweating and panting, over the 64 squares.
Meanwhile the commentator shifts surreally from one activity to the other - "he's got him on the ropes with some jabs and a powerful right hook", and now "Re1, an ingenious move seizing control of the open file". There have been chess boxing contests in London and LA, Kolkata and Tokyo.
One of the most insightful of chess commentators, grandmaster Jonathan Rowson, says that boxing is the sport that most closely resembles chess. "In part it's the purity of the competition," he says. "There is virtually nothing to mediate the one-to-one combat. Boxing has gloves, but there are no balls, no goalposts, no clubs or racquets."
Then there's the brutality. In boxing this is transparent. In chess it's sublimated but no less real. "The emotional impulse behind chess, and the pain it inflicts, is comparable - but just takes a different form," says Rowson. In chess, defeated players have nothing to blame other than the inadequacy of their mental apparatus - cognitive shortcomings with which they have to live each and every day. As such, defeat can be psychologically crushing.
And victory in chess, especially but not exclusively at the elite level, requires an extraordinary will to power. The former American world champion Bobby Fischer once said that he enjoyed the moment when he could feel the ego of his opponent crumbling.
And the Russian world champion Garry Kasparov, just as blunt, described chess as "the most violent sport there is", avowedly aiming to "destroy the adversary's ego". It's perhaps no coincidence that both boxing and chess are overwhelmingly male activities, and that the ferocious language used to describe chess would be equally apt for boxing. Chess players talk of "crushing" and "smashing" and "destroying" their opponents.
The BBC's Christian Parkinson takes to the ring - and the board
Lennox Lewis plays chess almost daily. He credits the game with keeping him out of trouble during his tough upbringing in east London. "When someone calls you a name you want to punch them out… but chess teaches you to think through the next moves."
He also believes it helped him in the ring itself, even in key bouts such as his famous fight against Mike Tyson. Tyson, he insists, was merely a one-dimensional fighter, lacking a sophisticated strategic sense. As in chess, Lewis had a plan. Against Tyson, as on the chess board, Lewis aimed to control the centre.
The chess pieces seem rather fragile in the former boxer's huge hands, whose giant 6ft 5in frame was always an intimidating presence for opponents.
Asked about the central appeal of the game, the erstwhile undisputed heavy-weight champion of the world, resorts to the metaphor of conflict: "I love the mental war".
Follow @BBCNewsMagazine on Twitter and onFacebook

Dystopias tell us where we are going

Dystopias tell us where we are going – and where we are not

By Peter Aspden peter.aspden@ft.com
December 23, 2013 7:27 pm
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3560aca0-68ac-11e3-996a-00144feabdc0.html

The outlook in ‘The Hunger Games’ is at least less bleak than in ‘1984’
“It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen . . . .”
The first, dislocating words of George Orwell’s 1984 were meant to stir readers from postwar complacency. Begun in 1947, during the opening skirmishes of the cold war, the novel illustrated the results of allowing an all-powerful state to rule without regard to the rights of its citizens.

It had a profound effect on our culture. Ever since its publication, we have been obsessed by the portrayal of dystopian nightmares. In the 1940s, these were mostly confined to sophisticated journalism and works of fiction, discussed heatedly in highbrow circles. But popular culture has proved to be in greater thrall to the fashioning of future doomsdays. This month, worldwide box office returns for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire surpassed the $700m mark. The film, based on the second part of Suzanne Collins’s trilogy of novels, is capturing young imaginations all around the globe. How to explain its popularity? Are we growing more scared, and rather enjoying it? Or are our worst fears being sanitised and rendered more acceptable?
Orwell’s satire spawned terms that survive to this day: Newspeak, Big Brother, Room 101. His remarkable book describes a state of being by which we now measure our civic health.
Today, we are nearly as far away from 1984 as Orwell was. Hindsight reveals that it was a pretty mixed year. In the bright cold days of April, the slight but tear-jerkingTerms of Endearment won five Oscars; US researchers announced their discovery of the Aids virus, which really was something to cry over.
Orwell’s prediction was palpably exaggerated. We bumble along, keeping the rats at bay. Yet our appetite for delving into dystopian fantasy as a form of therapy appears undiminished. We cannot stop picking at the scabs of our deepest fears.
The Hunger Games depicts a world that is cruel and violent, but which allows the glimpses of redemption that is the stuff of cult following. It is a work of its time: although the gladiatorial “games” described are based on the rough pastimes of ancient Roman high society, the mise en scène is strikingly modern.
The premise of the books and films is reassuringly remote. Two children, aged between 12 and 18, are selected every year by lottery from each of 12 outlying districts of a prosperous and unequal city-state. They must fight to the death in an arena created and manipulated by the authorities. There will be only one survivor, and he or she will attain wealth and celebrity status.
But there are many recognisable aspects in the nightmarish society depicted in The Hunger Games: a high camp, effetely attired elite enjoying its insulation from the proletarian masses; a media with frightening technological potential; an unquenchable voyeurism that has caused the loss of ethical bearings.
It is a skilled and occasionally amusing mash-up that provides pricks of discomfort. Ms Collins was inspired while zapping between reality shows and war coverage on television. Her inventions are not so far-fetched. The master of ceremonies of the games, played with gleeful abandon by Stanley Tucci, is only a slightly exaggeration of what we already have. The challenges in the jungle arena of Catching Fire are just extreme forms of the slug-eating, rat-infested trials in I’m a Celebrity . . . Get Me Out Of Here!, the UK reality show. Today, we vote to humiliate people; tomorrow we may want to inflict deeper damage.
Our dystopian fantasies are different today. The fears expressed in 1984, and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World before that, were philosophically based. Those fables followed the horrors of the second and first world wars. They pointed out what humanity was capable of, if we were to avert our gaze as in the build-up to those ignoble events.
There is less of that soul-searching in The Hunger Games. We see instead a vivid description of a hypermaterialist society – fired by, and in thrall to, miraculous feats of technology. There has been a convergence between the worst thing we can think of and where we are already heading. The warning is not so much against what is inside of us, but of the trinkets and bombast that tempt us into moral negligence.
Of course, the true allure of the dystopian story lies in the rebellious figure at its heart, in whom we place our hope of finding a way out of the moral darkness. Here, Orwell and Huxley’s protagonists disappoint, crushed by the respective systems against which they are pitted.
In The Hunger Games, the view is not so bleak. The 16-year-old Katniss Everdeen is the chosen vehicle for revolutionary change. Remember girl power? This could be its finest moment: we happily pin our hopes for insurrection on a sullen adolescent who fights the system with nothing more sophisticated than a bow and arrow.
Computerised infernos can be brought down by the most rudimentary of weapons; solidarity with morally just causes can vanquish unfeeling oppressors. The nightmares of the 21st century may feel close enough to touch; but they are more easily ended. These are messages from a society that feels generally pleased with itself. Whatever fresh hell we think of, we will find a way out. It is a triumph of the human spirit, of sorts.

Edward Snowden's Alternative Christmas message

Edward Snowden warns of a loss of privacy in his Alternative Christmas message broadcast on Channel 4

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet-security/10538055/Edward-Snowdens-Alternative-Christmas-message.html  

 Former US National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, who revealed details of electronic surveillance by American and British spy services, warned of the dangers posed by a loss of privacy in a message broadcast to Britain on Christmas Day.

In a two-minute video recorded in Moscow, where Snowden has been granted temporary asylum, he spoke of concerns over surveillance and appeared to draw comparison with the dystopian tale "1984" which described a fictional state which operates widespread surveillance of its citizens.

"Great Britain's George Orwell warned us of the danger of this kind of information. The types of collection in the book - microphones and video cameras, TVs that watch us are nothing compared to what we have available today."
"We have sensors in our pockets that track us everywhere we go. Think about what this means for the privacy of the average person," he said.

"A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all," said Snowden. "They'll never know what it means to have a private moment to themselves, an unrecorded, unanalysed thought. And that's a problem because privacy matters, privacy is what allows us to determine who we are and who we want to be."

http://eroticrepublic.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/christmas-message-snowden-v-her-majesty.html

Monday, December 23, 2013

How to anger Arab royals


UAE court convicts eight over 'spoof documentary video'



Shezanne Cassim Shezanne Cassim's family said the video merely poked fun at teenagers

Related Stories

Six foreigners and two UAE citizens have been sentenced to up to a year in jail for making what they say is a spoof video about Dubai youth culture.
A state security court found them guilty of "defaming the UAE society's image abroad", according to the state-owned newspaper, The National.
The family of American Shezanne Cassim, confirmed he was one of the six jailed for a year, three of them in absentia.
The foreigners were the first to be charged under a 2012 cybercrimes law.
It provides a legal basis to prosecute people who use information technology to criticise senior officials, argue for political reform or organise unlicensed demonstrations.
'No offence intended'
The National reported that an American, whom it referred to by the initials "S C", and two Indians, "R" and "A", were sentenced to a year in prison and given a 10,000 dirham ($2,723; £1,666) fine.

Start Quote

These young filmmakers are suffering the consequences of authorities who are increasingly sensitive to any form of criticism, no matter how mild”
Rori DonaghyEmirates Centre for Human Rights
Two UAE citizens, brothers -"S D" and "S D" - were jailed for eight months and fined 5,000 dirhams, while a third brother, "A D", was pardoned, the newspaper added.
A Canadian woman, "S", a British woman, "L", and an American man, "T", were convicted in absentia and sentenced to a year in prison and fined 10,000 dirhams.
The defendants were reportedly accused of violating Article 28, which calls for imprisonment for anyone who uses information technology "with the intent of inciting to actions, or publishing or disseminating any information, news, caricatures, or other images liable to endanger state security and its higher interests or infringe on the public order".
The 19-minute video, entitled Satwa Combat School, was posted on YouTube in October 2012.
It opens with the explanatory text: "The following events are fictional and no offence was intended to the people of Satwa or UAE."
Set in the Satwa district of Dubai, the video is a mock documentary about a fictional establishment in which students are taught to throw sandals as a form of weapon, and seek aid through social media when in need of back-up.
Cassim's family said the video poked fun at teenagers in Dubai who styled themselves as "gangstas" but were more known for their mild behaviour.
The UK-based Emirates Centre for Human Rights (ECHR) said the defendants were denied proper access to lawyers and made to sign documents they did not understand.
"These young filmmakers are suffering the consequences of authorities who are increasingly sensitive to any form of criticism, no matter how mild. This case has laid bare problems with due legal process and restrictive internet laws in the UAE," said the ECHR's director, Rori Donaghy.



Syria: Saudi prince's anger over royal biopic


Watch the movie on youtube

A still from the film King of the Sands

A Syrian film about the founder of modern Saudi Arabia has been shown in Damascus, despite attempts from a Saudi prince to have it banned, it appears.
The film, King of the Sands, was screened in the Syrian capital last Friday after being denounced by Prince Talal Bin-Abd-al-Aziz for "distorting a great historical figure", the Arabian Business website reports. It tells the story of the rise of late King Abd-al-Aziz Al Saud, also known as Ibn Saud, and the foundation of the Saudi kingdom in early 20th Century. The film, directed by Syrian Najdat Anzour, had its first showing in London last September, and is one of the first feature films to tackle the character of Ibn Saud, played by Italian actor Fabio Testi.
The feature is controversial in Saudi eyes because of the way it portrays Ibn Saud as "an unscrupulous, bloodthirsty womaniser who was a pawn of the British", Iranian Press TV reported earlier this year. The film's trailer shows a young Ibn Saud as a zealous leader, converting British intelligence officer John Philby to Islam "in name, without practise". In another scene, the trailer shows Ibn Saud in the bedroom with a young wife.
The director says the film is a useful piece of "history revision" that draws on what happened 100 years ago to comment on the "current chaos" in the Arab world.Lebanese pro-Hezbollah newspaper Al-Akhbar noted that the film had already been shown in Beirut, and Saudi objections are probably the result of Riyadh's support for the anti-Assad rebellion in Syria.
Prince Talal Bin-Abd-al-Aziz lambasted the feature on his Twitter account, saying: "This film will end up in the garbage bin of failed art works". The Saudi prince, who is one of Ibn Saud's 18 sons, added that he had sought the mediation of a "friend in common" with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to "ban showing the film" in the country. However, his mission appears to have failed, with Syrian TV showing a large audience applauding a screening at the opera house in Damascus.
Use #NewsfromElsewhere to stay up-to-date with our reports via Twitter.