Pages

Wednesday, September 24, 2014

What would make you give away all your money?

The multi-millionaire who gave away £16m... then lost his home, his possessions and his wife

Kindhearted Brian Burnie was so grateful when his wife recovered from cancer that he developed an addiction to helping other sufferers, but his actions have resulted in the end of his marriage



http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/multi-millionaire-who-gave-away-16m-4296584#ixzz3EGmpErLV
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook


A multi-millionaire who gave away his entire fortune has split with his wife after his Good Samaritan act destroyed their 30-year marriage.
It’s the ironic twist in the tale of a bizarre story which started when big-hearted Brian Burnie’s beloved wife Shirley fell ill with breast cancer.
The philanthropist was so delighted when she made a full recovery that he developed an addiction to helping cancer sufferers just like her.
Yet as the 70-year-old sold off their £16million mansion, auctioned their belongings and ploughed all the proceeds into his own cancer charity in 2009, the love of his life was at the end of her tether.
Although the pair failed to see eye-to-eye on his non-profit venture Daft As A Brush, Brian maintained all he needed was his family, publicly declaring at the time: “I’ve no interest in bricks and mortar. I’ve no interest in possessions.”
But four years after his selfless acts shocked and inspired the nation in equal measure, he also unintentionally lost the woman who had inspired him.
Speaking for the first time since the split, Shirley reveals: “I didn’t want to give everything away. We needed a home and an income and we have three children. I wanted security for us and our family.
“It took over his life, becoming more important than anything else to him. I said to him often that we had other things to consider, but his top three priorities were the charity, the charity and the charity.”
North News & Pictures ltdBrian and Shirley Burnie
Inside: Brian and Shirley Burnie in Doxford Hall in Northumberland
 
After selling off their 10-acre luxury estate Doxford Hall, complete with spa and hotel boasting a swimming pool and manicured lawns, the couple moved into a tiny rented terrace house in nearby Morpeth, Northumberland, opposite a council estate.
Brian’s runaround became a battered old Ford Fiesta.
He envisaged a simple existence where the pair would enjoy each other’s company rather than the trappings of wealth.
But an unfortunate chance encounter between his wife and a gossip at the local hairdresser threw his dream into disarray.
“I learned that he had bought a new home in Gosforth without telling me,” says Shirley.
“I confronted him and he admitted it was true. He’d owned it for three months and said nothing. I felt he’d made his ­preparations for the end of the marriage and waited for me to find out.
“There had to be a reason why he kept that quiet, I believed, and I assumed it must have been because he had decided the marriage was over and he was leaving.”
For heartbroken Shirley it was the final straw after her husband had repeatedly put his charity work before her since she won her own cancer battle.
In a burst of refreshing honesty after getting the all-clear, she said: “I didn’t intend to have to beat cancer and then spend the rest of my life living in a house like this and doing everything for everyone else. I’m sick of bloody charity and the hard work — we all are.”
Yet Brian was so blinded by his new devotion he failed to heed the old adage that charity begins at home.
Having given away all their collective wealth he then embarked on a charity campaign to get cancer patients free travel to and from hospital and cancer screening.
Shirley says that as well as giving up his money he was soon working 12 hours a day and barely seeing his family.
“I felt he had put me in a position where we had to end the marriage,” she says.
They divorced in 2012.
North News & Pictures ltdBrian Burnie
Kind: But Brian Burnie is now living in a small flat above his charity HQ
But Brian tells a different story, insisting he never wanted to end their relationship. And he still maintains there was nothing sinister about the purchase of the house.
“I never intended to live in it, I bought it for the charity but it wasn’t right and I had to get different premises,” he told the Sunday Mirror.
“I wish I’d never bought it because I could have put the money to better use.”
He goes on: “We live in a selfish, greedy society. If we can introduce our children to charitable acts at a young age, there is hope that the flame will take in them and they’ll see how much you get from helping others.”
His children are all grown up and he still sees them regularly, even though his actions mean they won’t get a penny.           
The eccentric jazz-loving Geordie, who left school with no qualifications aged 15, adds: “I had enough money to set them up for life, but I think that would be wrong.
“Your children have to make their own way.”
The marriage break-up has not surprised everyone. When they married in 1981, Brian insisted they ask for donations to Tyneside Leukaemia Research instead of wedding presents.
And their honeymoon, in a pal’s caravan in Cockermouth, Cumbria, was spent mostly with Brian working and Shirley going out for walks alone.
“I was a war-time baby and my mum and dad made me the way I am. I was born in a bedsit during the Second World War,” Brian says, trying to explain his actions.
“Nobody had much but I grew up knowing that if my mum and dad had food on the table, they’d share it with those around them.”
He never went to university but modestly says he had a “knack for business” that made him a vast fortune over 40 years.
He ­progressed from grocery delivery boy to builder’s apprentice, to trained engineer, to running his own company, first in construction, then petro­chemicals, and later recruitment.

He recalls: “We acquired the lifestyle, Doxford Hall, we lived very well, but nothing gave me as much pleasure as giving it all away.”
It was a trait which made him the perfect man in many women’s eyes – a millionaire with a heart of gold.
Shirley was no different and indulged him in his passion, including hosting a fish and chips lunch for 5,000 war veterans in their walled garden.
But when she was diagnosed with cancer she needed her husband’s charitable nature the most.
Yet no sooner had she secured her place on the long road to recovery than his generosity began to spiral out of control.
What to some may have looked like a touching tribute, Shirley describes as “madness”.
And whereas her husband became known locally as St Brian, she started suffering from charity fatigue. “Each year it just got bigger and bigger — no event was a one-off,” Shirley said at the time of the sale of Doxford Hall.
“I’m happy to do my bit, but if you’re married to someone like Brian, it takes over your life. He sweeps everyone along.”
The tale of the man who had it all, then gave it all away features in TV documentary Jon Richardson Grows Up, on Channel 4 tomorrow at 10.35pm. There is no mention of the couple’s sad split, though it does show Brian living alone in a small flat above Daft As A Brush HQ.
Asked if he kept anything for himself he replies: “Nothing. I live off my pension, even that goes to the charity when I die.”
Shirley says: “Brian has what he wanted. We keep hearing he’s never been happier, which hurts a bit given that we had 30 years of marriage and three children, but he has made his choice.”


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/multi-millionaire-who-gave-away-16m-4296584#ixzz3EGma9C1K
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook

Iranian Happy video dancers sentenced to 91 lashes and jail


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYnLRf-SNxY&feature=youtu.be


Iran: Happy video dancers sentenced to 91 lashes and jail

19 September 2014 Last updated at 10:14

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-29272732


The BBC's Rana Rahimpour reported on the Iranians' release from prison in May

Related Stories

Six Iranians arrested for appearing in a video dancing to Pharrell Williams' song Happy have been sentenced to up to one year in prison and 91 lashes, their lawyer says.
The sentences were suspended for three years, meaning they will not go to prison unless they reoffend, he adds.
The video shows three men and three unveiled women dancing on the streets and rooftops of Tehran.
In six months, it has been viewed by over one million people on YouTube.
The majority of people involved in the video were sentenced to six months in prison, with one member of the group given one year, lawyer Farshid Rofugaran was quoted by Iran Wire as saying.
The "Happy we are from Tehran" video was brought to the attention of the Iranian authorities in May, after receiving more than 150,000 views.
Members of the group behind the video were subsequently arrested by Iranian police for violating Islamic laws of the country, which prohibit dancing with members of the opposite sex and women from appearing without a headscarf.
They later appeared on state-run TV saying they were actors who had been tricked into make the Happy video for an audition.
The arrests drew condemnation from international rights groups and sparked a social media campaign calling for their release.
Williams, whose song was nominated for an Oscar earlier this year, also protested at the arrests.
"It is beyond sad that these kids were arrested for trying to spread happiness," he wrote on Facebook.

More on This Story

Related Stories

Joe Biden gaffe week: What did he say now?


Joe Biden gaffe week: What did he say now? (+video)

Biden capped off a week full of unfortunate word choices Friday by reminiscing fondly about disgraced Sen. Bob Packwood ... at a Democratic Women's Leadership Forum.

By , Staff writer 


Joe Biden apologizes for using anti-Semitic word to...
He called banks who take advantage of U.S. soldiers 'shylocks' during an event September 16.
Geez, Joe Biden, it’s been kind of a rough week for him, hasn’t it? At least in terms of slips of the tongue.
First there was the controversy when Vice President Biden used the pejorative “shylocks” during a Tuesday speech. He ended up apologizing to the Anti-Defamation League for using a word derived from Shakespeare’s stereotypically offensive Jewish money-lender character in “The Merchant of Venice.”
Then on Wednesday in another public appearance Biden talked about “the Orient” when referring to former Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kwan Yew. Some Asians see that as demeaning – an old-time, mystery-of-the-Far-East phrase that belittles their continent.
Recommended: Beyond Hillary Clinton: Eight Democrats who might run if she doesn't
And on Friday came gaffe number three. As a means of illustrating how the Republican Party has in his eyes moved to the right and become more intransigent, he discussed former GOP senators who in their day worked across the aisle to get important legislative work done. One he mentioned was former Maryland Sen. Charles “Mac” Mathias. Then Biden threw in “Packwood” – former Oregon Sen. Bob Packwood.
Senator Packwood resigned under pressure in 1995 due to the emergence of multiple, highly detailed allegations of sexual harassment and assault against women. He might well have been expelled if he had not quit first – the Senate Ethics Committee had already recommended that he be kicked out.
Did we say that the conference at which Biden referred positively to Packwood was a Democratic Women’s Leadership forum?
Joe Biden has in fact been an outspoken advocate of measures designed to protect women against violence for his whole political career. Twenty years ago, he was a primary sponsor of the Violence Against Women Act, a ground-breaking law that made it easier to prosecute such crimes and allocated more federal money for that purpose.
Jon Stewart of “The Daily Show” actually pointed this out Thursday night, saying that Biden had spoken “passionately about the issue” since the day he arrived in Washington.
But “as Joe Biden giveth, Joe Biden taketh away,” intoned Stewart.
In other words, the supercharged speaking ability that makes Biden passionate can also be his downfall. The words come out too fast and hang there, in the air before him, and he can’t grab them back. It’s too late.
That’s why Biden has risen as far as he is going to, according to Stewart, talking about the “shylock” and “Orient” mistakes.
“Of the United States, he will not be President,” said Stewart.
We agree with that. (Yes, we’ve been wrong before – feel free to remind us of this prediction when President Biden and VP Elizabeth Warren take the oath in 2017.)
That got us thinking. Dick Cheney did not run for president. It does not appear as if Joe Biden will win the nomination. How long has it been since two VPs in a row did not get a chance at the brass ring of American power?
Specifically, who were the last two Veeps in a row who subsequently did not win a party presidential nomination, or accede to the presidency through the president’s death or resignation?  
It’s been a while. Charles Curtis, VP under Herbert Hoover, lost his post when Franklin Delano Roosevelt won the 1932 election. He retired to practice law in Washington and never ran for office again. Then FDR’s first VP, John Nance Garner, served two terms and then ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1940. He lost when the canny Roosevelt maneuvered his way into an unprecedented third term. That was it for Garner’s political career.
FDR’s second VP, Henry Wallace, was a liberal who ran for president as the Progressive Party candidate in 1948. So we’ll go with VPs Curtis and Garner as the winners of this dubious prize.
[Editor's note: John Nance Garner's name was misspelled in the original version.]

The Pinocchio paradox: How many lies make Obama a liar?

5 lies that have shaped the Obama presidency

If past presidents are remembered for their signature achievements, Obama will be remembered for his signature lie: “If you like your health care plan, blah, blah, blah.” The reader knows the rest. Although the most consequential of Obama’s lies — it got him re-elected — it’s far from his only prevarication.
I’ve counted 75 significant lies since his campaign for president began, but that doesn’t begin to tally the casual fibs and hyperbole he spouts seemingly every day. Here are five that illustrate just how much Obama’s presidency is built on falsehoods.

5. “My father left my family when I was 2 years old.”

Modal Trigger
Photo: EPA

Obama made this claim in September 2009, when addressing the nation’s schoolkids. By then, the blogosphere knew that baby Obama had never spent a night under the same roof as his father, let alone two years.
For years, Obama and his advisers invested enormous political capital in what biographer David Remnick called Obama’s “signature appeal: the use of the details of his own life as a reflection of a kind of multicultural ideal.”
Remnick called Obama’s autobiography “a mixture of verifiable fact, recollection, recreation, invention and artful shaping.” In other words, the truth is never good enough.

4. “The Fast and Furious program was a field-initiated program begun under the previous administration.”

Modal Trigger
Photo: WireImage

Obama spun this fiction at a September 2012 Univision forum knowing it was false. In fact, the bizarre, deadly idea to let American guns “walk” into Mexico, where they were used by drug cartels to kill dozens, began in October 2009.
Three months earlier, White House press secretary Jay Carney had made the same bogus claim virtually word for word at a press conference and got shot down on national TV. “It began in fall 2009,” corrected White House correspondent Jake Tapper, then with ABC.
Carney refused to acknowledge he lied, and the president continued to lie weeks later. It’s all part of Obama’s ducking of responsibility — it’s always someone else’s fault.

3. “Not even a smidgen of corruption.”

Modal Trigger
Photo: Getty Images

Obama said this in response to Bill O’Reilly’s question about the IRS scandal: “You’re saying no corruption?”
If there were not even a “smidgen of corruption,” as Obama insisted, it is hard to understand what outraged him, or at least seemed to, when news of the IRS scandal first broke. “It’s inexcusable, and Americans are right to be angry about it, and I am angry about it,” Obama said in May 2013. Obama routinely expressed anger when some new scandal erupted on his watch — IRS, the failed ObamaCare website, the VA scandal, Fast and Furious — but never before had he shoved a scandal down the memory hole so quickly.
And how could Obama know there wasn’t a smidgen of corruption before the investigation was even over? Perhaps because the administration knew that any proof of that was gone with deleted emails and destroyed hard drives?

2. “We revealed to the American people exactly what we understood at the time.”

Modal Trigger
Photo: AP

During that same Super Bowl Sunday interview, Obama made this claim in response to O’Reilly’s inquiry about the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi. Obama continued to dissemble: “The notion that we would hide the ball for political purposes when a week later we all said, in fact, there was a terrorist attack taking place and the day after I said it was an act of terror, that wouldn’t be a very good coverup.”
In fact, it was exactly a week after the attack, on Sept. 18, that Obama took his first questions about Benghazi. Bizarrely, he did so to David Letterman. “Here’s what happened,” Obama said.
“You had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character who — who made an extremely offensive video directed at — at Mohammed and Islam.”
We know now that the administration knew this wasn’t true. Not a week later; not even the very night of the attacks.
On many levels, this was Obama’s most telling lie. He only deals with the world as he sees it, not as it is.

1. “Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency.”

Modal Trigger
Photo: AP

Obama told this whopper to his assembled staff on his first day in office. He promised it to the press. Instead, his administration refuses to hand over documents and Obama refuses to answer questions. As liberal constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley assessed the presidency, “Barack Obama is really the president Richard Nixon always wanted to be.”
What do these lies, just a sample of many, tell us? Obama never stopped “artfully shaping” his life.
The scary thing is he might actually believe these lies. He believes that posting a shot from his personal photographer online is “transparent.” That targeting conservative groups for audits isn’t corrupt. That everything that has gone wrong with his presidency is Bush’s fault.
Knowing that, how can we believe anything that he says?
Jack Cashill is the author of “You Lie! The Evasions, Omissions, Fabrications, Frauds and Outright Falsehoods of Barack Obama” (Broadside Books), out Oct. 7.
http://nypost.com/2014/09/13/how-falsehoods-and-fibs-have-shaped-the-obama-presidency/

Why David Cameron's meeting with the Iranian president is so significant

http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/why-david-camerons-meeting-with-the-iranian-president-is-so-significant--g1ts0QhbBg

David Cameron met Iranian President Hassan Rouhani at the UN General Assembly in New York this week to discuss the fight against Isis.
It was the first face-to-face meeting between the two countries’ leaders in 35 years.

Why have relations been so frayed?

Britain severed diplomatic ties with Iran in 1979 following the country’s Islamic revolution which saw the installation of the first supreme religious and political leader - Ayatollah Khomeini.
Relations between the countries were further aggravated by numerous diplomatic incidents - including the siege of the Iranian embassy in London in 1980 and the Fatwaissued against British writer Salman Rushdie in 1990.
Not to mention Iranian distrust of London, owing to suspicions about Britain’s role in the country’s 1953 coup d’etat and the British-Soviet invasion during World War II.
Null
Former President, Mahmoud Ahmedinejad (Picture: AP)
In more recent years the issue of Iran’s nuclear programme has been the source of most tensions - with Britain and other Western powers imposing sanctions because they believed the country was, or is, building a bomb.
The British embassy reopened in Tehran in 1988 but was shut down again in 2011 when it was ransacked by a paramilitary group.
Relations with former President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad were notoriously frosty.

The thaw in relations

Diplomatic relations between the countries were said to have “thawed considerably” in recent months, particularly since the election of the more politically-moderate Mr Rouhani in August 2013.
The Foreign Office released a statement in October of last year which said:
We hope that following the election of President Rouhani Iran will engage constructively with the E3+3 [UK, France, Germany + USA, Russia, China] and reach a negotiated settlement with the international community on the nuclear issue.
  • Foreign and Commonwealth Office statement, October 2013

The views of Rouhani - a former nuclear negotiator - on political freedoms and equality are seen as more in step with those of the West than his predecessor Mahmoud Ahmedinejad. Although there are still worries over human rights abuses in the country.
An international interim negotiation was reached in January of this year whereby Iran agreed to limit its uranium enrichment programme and with a final deal planned for November.
Iran’s embassy reopened in London this summer for the first time since 2011.
Cameron spoke to Rouhani via telephone in November last year and ahead of the pair’s meeting today, Philip Hammond, the British Foreign Secretary, met with his Iranian counterpart Mohammed Zarif in New York earlier this week (below).

A potential trade-off?

Null
Number 10 said earlier this week that it still holds a firm stance on Iran’s nuclear programme but is hoping that Mr Rouhani will withdraw support for Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.
Critics fear that the prime minister may be forced to make a “trade-off” with Iran, by giving concessions on its nuclear programme in return for action against Isis.
As Oliver Wright in the Independent reports, the meeting may also cause dismay in Israel as well as Sunni countries in the Gulf as it will be seen as a proxy for talks between President Rouhani and the US administration.